Love, attract, as well as the inhibition away from opinion away from close alternatives

Love, attract, as well as the inhibition away from opinion away from close alternatives

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you can Peoples Conclusion, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place off accessory inside the people mating. Writeup on Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Websites contradiction revisited. Record away from Societal Facts, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites contradiction: A personal tech one to decreases social wedding and you will emotional really-becoming? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.Meters., & Sphere, J. Yards. (2001). Count, time, and you can time of marriage ceremonies and you can divorces. Newest Population Accounts, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research away from closeness, hobbies, and you can partnership: Analysis the fresh new assumptions of triangular principle of like. Mental Account, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step three.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Effect ideal regarding the creating worse: Personal evaluations within this close matchmaking. Diary of Identification and you can Personal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The new implicit knowledge of close rivalry. Record regarding Identification and you will Public Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.

A beneficial. (2001)mitment and you will relationship maintenance components

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A great., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention to help you attractive possibilities: New evolved therapy of matchmaking maintenance. Development and you can Individual Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential investigation regarding argument and you may accord within the distressed and nondistressed relationship partners. Record out of Contacting and you may Scientific Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. Good., Green, A great. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Matchmaking creation on the internet: What is the large appeal? Record out of Societal Things, 58(1), 9–30.

The benefits of confident illusions: Idealization additionally the structure of pleasure from inside the romantic relationships

Neff, L. A beneficial., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-comparison purposes when you look at the intimate relationship: A style of internationally improvement and you may specific verification. In P. Noller & J. An excellent. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding ents on the examination of pair correspondence (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge School Press.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the customer-counselor bond through the lens of attachment idea. Psychotherapy: Theory, Look, Behavior, Training, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The new public monitoring system: Improved sensitivity to personal cues because the a transformative reaction to societal exception to this rule. During the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The latest public outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and you can bullying (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Psychology Force.

Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Global and you will certain relational activities throughout the contact with social relations. Diary out of Identity and you may Social Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An effective., Tran, S., ). Connection and you can advice seeking to within the romantic dating. Personality and you will Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and specific attachment representations in the adulthood: Can there be a romance?. Journal Of Societal And personal Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. During the J. Harvey & A good. Wenzel (Eds.), Close personal relationship: Repair and you can improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, Good. D. (2000). Projection actually impression one of partners because the a function of this new similarity within common feel. Character And you will Societal Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Results of salience out-of extrinsic perks to the liking and serbisk mest sexede pige you can loving. Log of Character and you can Public Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.

Related Popular Posts

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Scroll al inicio